Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

IEngs are not failed CEngs. . .


How long will it take before the message gets home that incorporated engineers are not failed chartered engineers?

Both are vital to the profession.

The letter from Alex Hoffen (NCE last week) shows how far the Institution has still to travel in promoting the associate membership grade. A candidate who fails MPR is just as unlikely to pass AMPR as a failed AMPR candidate is to pass MPR. Both reviews are tailored to the requirement of the grades. Incorporated engineers need to have depth of knowledge in specialist areas, while chartered engineers need the breadth of understanding to see the bigger picture and to exercise conceptual creativity.

Once this message is understood, acceptance of vertical integration and the single grade of membership will be a lot nearer.

Graham Davison-Smith,

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.