Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ICE vice president calls for more flood resilience

Homes and infrastructure must be made more flood resistent, the ICE said this week in response to the wave of disruption caused by severe weather over Christmas.

ICE vice president and flooding expert David Balmforth said road, rail and electricity networks should be better able to withstand the impact of floods.

Heavy rain and storm surges have caused a raft of road and rail closures over the past few weeks, while thousands of homes were left without power on Christmas Day.

Balmforth said climate change would make it impossible to rely on flood defences to keep communities and the economy protected from high water levels.

“It is a surprise that as a country we have not got our heads around the idea that this type of weather will be the norm,” he told NCE.

“We are not making progress on making communities more resilient. We have to start doing much better at building flood resilience into communities.

Flood prevention not always possible

“Our main strategy is to prevent areas from flooding but that will not always be possible,” he said.

Balmforth called for homes to be built with flood-resistant exterior doors, concrete ground floor slabs and specially rendered walls. He added that transport and power infrastructure should also be designed to operate in times of flooding.

“I have been working in Singapore recently, where the openings to the Metro system are 1m above ground, and it has been able to operate through floods,” he said.

“We have plenty of examples of road and rail built on embankments for protection but it is not done universally. We get caught out.”

“The cost of building in flood resilience is often not that great; it is more about forward planning.”

Balmforth said clear plans should be drawn up to cope with future extreme weather events.

“We need to make decisions about what we are going to protect - and focus on resilience in those areas we are not going to protect.”

Balmforth described as a “concern” forthcoming job cuts at the Environment Agency, where employee numbers are due to fall by more than 10% to 9,700 by October .

“You have to be concerned, but I am told that key jobs in flood resilience will be protected and that would be very sensible,” he said.

“We don’t have a bottomless pit of funds so we have to prioritise.”

The Environment Agency has insisted the job cuts will not affect its ability to cope with major floods.

Readers' comments (2)

  • In addition to flood resilience full SUDS is essential for all new development and extra reservoir capacity for existing storm water drainage. Planning Departments still do not understand the concept and it is necessary to complete the legistration to force them into line and to realise the maintenance implications.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whilst it is OK to look at makeingnew properties more flood resilient, what about the millions of existing properties which are at risk? We simply must drive flood defence up the infrastructure agenda. Apparently we are more interested in spending £50bn plus on cutting a few minutes off a rail journey between only two fixed points than protecting properties from flooding and the billions that that will cost us in repairs and the economic disaster. We do persist in some very muddled thinking in the UK.
    Jim Barrack

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.