Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ICE reveals flood fears for east England

The ICE East of England (ICEEE) group has issued its response to the government’s East of England regional plan, warning that extensive new build will increase the chances of flooding to new and existing settlements.
ICEE says the existing plan also brushes over environmental concerns and the provision of sufficient infrastructure.

ICE East of England regional manager John Canton believes an opportunity has been missed. “I applaud the open and transparent consultation process and excellent work of the inspector in handling the inquiry.

“I am also pleased the need for investment and a framework to manage the impact of development in the face of climate change has been taken on board,” he said.

“What concerns me is the plan’s wording is weak and watered down when it comes to issues like water supply, waste management and public transport.

“There is no more than a passing acknowledgement of the need to accomplish the plan within environmental limits. Zero or carbon-positive construction, mandatory energy efficiency and renewable energy provisions seem to have been glossed over, yet our profession is under increasing pressure to observe these standards,” Canton said.

The government’s plans propose a huge expansion of the East, with more than 500,000 new homes built, particularly around Colchester, Ipswich, Norwich and Thetford.

The ICEE responses are critical of the decision “to subjugate to secondary text the concept that development should not increase flood risk elsewhere,” it reads.

They say that the East of England proposals, “ignore the significant risk that development at the head of a catchment can cause to existing communities further downstream.”

“Given the considerable pressure for development to take place where economic and transport links are strongest this often guides development to river valleys or the coast and we consider a more holistic approach could and should be adopted,” the response concluded.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs