Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hub hubbub


I read with incredulity the proposal to build a new international air hub at Cliffe (NCE 7 November). Has not the time arrived to confront the obvious? Heathrow is an airport of great national importance and its geographical position at least gives access to some of the rest of the country.

Proposals for expanding it provoke all sorts of outcry about noise and quality of life for residents living close by - witness the inquiry into Terminal Five.

What will it cost to buy the residents out? What will it cost to have a non-residential zone around the airport that takes account of the current and projected noise path of additional runways and terminals? Indeed the land made available from such purchases would have a significant value for commercial development next to the airport.

The cost, I suspect, would be a small fraction of starting at a completely new location with no local infrastructure at all, imposing more noise paths over another part of the country.

Ranald Crook, ranald_crook@hotmail. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.