Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hot air


I would take issue with the economics of the Buckingham Palace 'tongue in cheek' wind turbine (news last week). The indication is that it can pay for itself in 15 to 20 years by lowering energy costs.

My calculations indicate that to completely pay for the device in 20 years - assuming a £30,000 cost including foundations, planning consent, electrical connections and controls, but not standby power - at a competitive 6% interest rate would require a monthly payment in the order of £215.

Assuming a generous 30% efciency, monthly generation would be 1,320KWh, giving a cost of over 16p per KWh. Not much of a lowering of cost!

Derek Limbert (F), 16 Hutchinngs Road, Knotty Green, Beaconseld, Bucks, HP9 2BB

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.