Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Horror move

Letters

I write to express my dismay at the article concerning mandatory CPD (NCE last week). As membership of the Institution is not a prerequisite for civil engineers to practice it is doubtful whether the ICE can enforce mandatory CPD without losing more existing members.

It would be more appropriate for the ICE to turn its efforts to ensuring a system, such as licensing, is established in this country where designs, completed works etc. have to be approved, or 'signed off', by a Chartered or Incorporated Engineer before considering introducing such mandatory requirements. This would then provide a reason to remain a member.

While the support and comments of the CITB are understandable considering their remit, they appear to forget that health and safety is only one aspect of the work of a civil engineer. Had they been interviewed I am sure that representatives of other aspects of civil engineering would make similar comments.

David Hubie (M), Hubie@btinternet. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.