Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Highways Agency helps out low scoring CAT firms

THE HIGHWAYS Agency has this week thrown a lifeline to firms gaining low scores on its new supplier ranking system.

It has decided that scores achieved using its Capability Assessment Toolkit (CAT) will be averaged when firms team together to win work.

The Agency had previously indicated that scores would be based on the lowest achieved by either partner.

The CAT assesses firms under 18 different criteria with the top five scores automatically put onto shortlists for work over £5M.

Last week the Agency said that it was more likely the lowest score would be taken when firms band together, severely damaging the chances of poor scoring firms being invited into joint ventures.

'Various options for aggregating company CAT scores have been considered, but I can confirm that vendor ratings will be based on averages of the individual company scores, ' said Agency supply chain manager Gary Wright.

The Agency's change of heart comes as firms begin to forge partnerships for the first contract that will use the scoring system - the Area 2 (Somerset & Dorset) Enhanced Managing Agent Contractor (EMAC).

This will almost certainly attract bids from consultant/ contractor alliances.

Consultants Parsons Brinkerhoff, Faber Maunsell and Mott MacDonald are all understood to be interested in bidding, as are contractors Amec, Carillion, Nuttall, Lafarge and Fitzpatrick.

Parsons and FaberMaunsell appear to be best placed consultants, with high scores of 61 and 60 respectively.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.