Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

High Court challenge on McAlpine re-branding


CONTRACTOR ALFRED McAlpine's decision last year to re-brand itself as 'McAlpine' amounted to an appropriation of the 'entire goodwill' of the McAlpine name, the High Court heard this week.

That goodwill is shared by two major companies, said counsel for Sir Robert McAlpine, Roger Wyand QC.

Sir Robert McAlpine is seeking an injunction against Alfred McAlpine over its decision to re-brand. Sir Robert McAlpine claims that Alfred McAlpine's move allowed it, unfairly, to 'punch above its weight' when bidding for work.

Wyand also claimed that Sir Robert McAlpine's reputation would suffer if anything went wrong with a project run by newly branded McAlpine.

A significant part of the prestige of the McAlpine name has been created by Sir Robert McAlpine's work on 'landmark' construction projects such as the Millennium Dome, the Croydon tramway and the Jubilee Line Extension, Wyand claimed.

He told the court that in the early 1980s it was agreed to differentiate the names as a long term geographical split between the two companies' activities started to dissolve.

The case continues.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.