Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hat truss theory adds to WTC collapse controversy


CONTROVERSY STILL surrounds the exact collapse mechanism of the Twin Towers, despite three years of detailed investigation by the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) team.

Some engineers believe the collapse was influenced by factors other than the fires caused by burning aviation fuel which weakened vital structural steel elements. And they have accused NIST of repeatedly changing its explanation of the collapse mechanism.

'In this latest version, the 'hat trusses' on top of the towers play a crucial role in the redistribution of stresses after the impact, ' one leading US structural engineer told NCEI in New York. 'In earlier versions they are hardly mentioned.' (NCEI December 2004).

The trusses were originally designed to carry loads from TV towers on the roofs - but only WTC 1 ever had such a tower.

NIST now believes the trusses helped the upper storeys of the towers to stand up after the aircraft impacts.

Consultant rup as equently criticised NIST's analysis of the collapse mechanism.

Last month Arup went on the attack again. In a statement, Arup associate Dr Barbara Lane said: 'We consider thermal expansion in fire to be a leading factor in a collapse.

'This does not seem to have been addressed in NIST's recommendations, but we hope it will become part of the ongoing discussions going forward.'

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.