Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hard shoulder running: a disaster waiting to happen?

I wonder in amazement how the M42 hard shoulder running can be deemed a success until it's proven that the emergency services have dealt successfully with a major pile up or that such a pile up is improbable at 50mph.

To take a parallel on a nautical theme, we all recognise that lifebelts are an adequate safeguard for small boats, but would we really remove the lifeboats from cruise ships to accommodate more passengers?

If this goes ahead, there will come a point when widespread use of hard shoulder running will be a mistake of titanic proportions.

-ALAN BAMFORTH, managing director, ABG, E7 Meltham Mills Road, Meltham, Holmfirth HD9 4DS

Perhaps the time has come to trial adding reduced lengths of hard shoulders on motorways to release the existing hard shoulder as an extra lane – that is between bridges – to save on bridge demolition or widening and general construction costs and probably land acquisition. This already happens in some restricted sites but is the exception rather than the norm. It would allow existing hard shoulders to be converted to full running lanes, albeit probably needing strengthening in most cases.

The question as to what happens at gantries, retaining walls, safety fencing, lighting and drainage would obviously also need to be addressed. However, the problem of increasing side slopes gradients can often be overcome with the latest reinforced grids.

It is not clear from the "Road Plan Warning" story last week whether this is proposed as an option or whether detailed studies have already been done on the safety implications of this reduced standard motorway and the idea discarded.

-DAVID GARDNER (M),
david.t.gardner@btinternet.com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.