Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hard shoulder debate runs on

I know of no other country which has come up with the idea of hard shoulder running to ‘augment’ motorway capacity (NCE 24 April).

Hard shoulders were not designed for continuous trafficking, and running cars on them cannot be regarded as a long term congestion solution.

Therefore I can see nothing innovative about the described plans – just another excuse for not making “proper” investments in transport infrastructure.

Similarly, especially with the current increase in food prices, I cannot accept that Britain, with relatively limited food production areas, can in the long term afford to lose valuable agricultural land to “managed retreat”.

The Dutch have shown that there are alternatives, albeit at a cost, and therefore I agree that this is a low investment option which will cost us dearly in future – when it will presumably be too late to reverse the process.

MIKE PAUL, Stuttgart, Germany, Michael.Paul@zueblin.de

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.