Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ground force

Letters

With regard to your article 'digging for dirty secrets' (NCE, 1 March), ground investigation often proves to be a costly experience for any construction project.

But while knowing of chemically or radioactively contaminated ground increases project costs for clearance or treatment, not knowing bears the risk of time delays and overspending.

In the interest of the overall budget for the Olympics and London's taxpayers, I strongly hope that most attention is paid to the large-scale 'ground investigations' already under way in the area.

For example, the project to undermine the entire area with power cable tunnels. These have a diameter of up to 4m, are up to 26m deep and will result in a 'ground sample' of 160,000m 3 to 180,000m 3.

The excavated muck could give vital hints regarding type, location and extent of contamination.

Gabi Chlebowski (M), gabi_ground@gmx. de

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.