Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Grenfell | Who’s who

Grenfell Tower fire

Roles and responsibilities of key organisations at Grenfell Tower


Owns Grenfell Tower, but as of April 1996 handed responsibility for managing it to The Kensington

& Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO). The council still owns the properties and retains responsibility for strategic housing policies and homeless people.


Responsible for managing the building along with 9,760 others in the borough. The relationship between KCTMO and the council is governed by a management agreement, which covers all areas of the council’s landlord function. In 2002, KCTMO took over the responsibility for major capital works from the council to access extra resources and funding to enable KCTMO to bring its properties up to the Decent Homes Standard.


Contracted by KCTMO to carry out a partial refurbishment of the building in summer 2014.


Appointed by KCTMO as the employer’s agent, CDM co-ordinator and quantity surveyor for the partial refurbishment of Grenfell Tower. This included scrutinising tenders for the refurbishment.


Appointed to work on the Grenfell Tower refurbishment, but refused to give details of its role. The firm said it was shocked and distressed by the fire: “It would be inappropriate for us to comment or speculate on events on Wednesday morning. We will be available to assist the relevant authorities as and when we are required,” it said.


Appointed building services engineer for the Grenfell Tower refurbishment by KCTMO, but declined to comment further.


Installed the exterior aluminium composite material (ACM) overcladding panels during the refurbishment as a subcontractor to Rydon. Managing director Ray Bailey said: “At this time, we are not aware of any link between the fire and the exterior cladding to the tower.”


Fabricated (cut to shape) two of the components in the building’s cladding system (rainscreen panels and windows) using materials, and to a design it says were “specified by the Grenfell Tower design and build team”. It has added that “CEP’s role was limited to fulfilling the order for components to the specification, design and choice of material determined by the design and build contracting team.

“Investigators should focus on the whole system including insulation materials, fire barriers, fixings and railings. They should also look at the overall design and quality of installation and also at whether an assessment on the whole system was carried out.”


Supplied Reynobond PE, the aluminium composite material (ACM) used as a component of the exterior overcladding system at Grenfell Tower. A statement from the firm said: “Current regulations within the United States, Europe and the UK permit the use of aluminium composite material in various architectural applications, including in high-rise buildings depending on the cladding system and overall building design. Our product is one component in the overall cladding system; we don’t control the overall system or its compliance.”


Manufactures and supplies the insulation product RS5000, which was added to Grenfell Tower during its refurbishment. The firm said: “Safety testing was undertaken on RS5000 as part of a particular rainscreen cladding system and this is described in documents available on our website. As noted in those documents, any changes to components of the cladding system or construction methods used need to be considered by the relevant building designer.”

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.