Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Green infrastructure obsession "damaging" Britain, think tank warns

Transport and energy infrastructures in Britain are being damaged by politicians’ obsession with ‘green’ technology, according to a report from the independent think tank Reform.

It says that the £4bn a year being spent on sustainable energy should be phased out, allowing for “a new culture of entrepreneurship”.

This would allow companies to build new road, rail and broadband networks and “repeat the success of low-cost airlines”.

“The UK is on a road to nowhere. Vast amounts of taxpayers’ money are being spent subsidising uneconomic activity,” said Reform deputy director Elizabeth Truss.

The report says that politicians are blinded by the “green heat of technology” leaving Britain’s infrastructure “creaking”.

Meanwhile, private road and rail investments are being blocked by bureaucrats while ministers favour grand projects such as high-speed rail and wind power.

Instead, says the report, they should be promoting the roads and nuclear power needed to drive growth and reduce carbon emissions.

The report notes that although the UK is ranked sixth in the world for gross domestic product, it is 34th for the quality of its infrastructure.

It cites the £2.8bn levy on utility bills for new energy and broadband projects that are “uneconomic” and the “thousands of green jobs that will remain a pipedream”.

A further £1.3bn will be spent funding this activity that “will not address the real problems preventing private investment, including planning sclerosis and over-zealous bureaucracy”.

Readers' comments (1)

  • What does it say about the impact of the civil engineering profession that we are 34th in the world for quality of infrastructure?

    We risk becoming a laughing stock when, for example, an Infrastructure Planning Commission is set up to take a necessary strategic view on infrastructure investment, only to be very likely extinguished as soon as the Conservatives get elected.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.