Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Government's microgeneration cash-back scheme slammed

Government proposals to allow homeowners to cash in on small-scale energy generation by selling it on to the National Grid have been slammed by engineers for offering misleading figures.

From April homeowners who install low-carbon micro-generation such as wind turbines and solar panels will be paid for the electricity they generate, even if they use it themselves.

Homeowners will get a further payment for any electricity they feed into the grid, and will also benefit from reduced bills as they need to buy less electricity.

Feed-in tariffs will set the level of payment depending on the technology. The Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) claimed a typical 2.5kW photovoltaic installation could pay a homeowner up to £900 and save £140 a year on electricity bills

But the Royal Academy of Engineering said the return was likely to be far below headline figures.

The Academy’s visiting professor in building engineering physics at the University of Bath Doug King said studies had shown that small-scale renewables schemes often generate far less energy than expected.

He said that under the new feed-in tariff an average wind turbine on a home would pay a homeowner just £69 per year on top of the electricity bill savings of £26.

“Feed-in tariffs will provide a great stimulus to the renewable energy sector. But I am concerned that the headline figures being quoted for financial returns could encourage people to make unwise investments,” he said.

“Feed-in tariffs will pay according to the amount of renewable electricity generated and studies have shown that small scale renewable systems often generate far less in practice than originally anticipated,” he said.

A 2009 study of small scale, domestic wind turbines by the Energy Savings Trust found no urban or suburban installation that generated more than 200 units of electricity per year.

“There is no question that a well designed renewable energy system in the right location is a benefit, but for many of us living in towns and cities the conditions are just not ideal,” said King. “In fact you will often be better off investing in energy savings at home or in a large scale renewable energy scheme through a co-operative or commercial venture.”

The Renewable Energy Association (REA) welcomed the news, but said the full effect will not be felt until 2011, when 2011 the scheme will be expanded to include ground source heat pumps, biomass boilers and air source heat pumps.

Under the proposed tariffs the installation of a ground source heat pump in an average semi-detached house with adequate insulation levels could be rewarded with £1,000 a year and lead to savings of £200 per year if used instead of heating oil.

“The UK may be languishing behind the rest of Europe on renewable heat, but the proposals launched today are an important world first,” said REA policy director Gaynor Hartnell.

“Renewable heat is the sleeping giant of renewable energy in the UK with a major contribution to make. The sooner we invest and build capacity in the renewable heat industry, the better value and energy security this will bring the UK - and the more jobs will be created.”

Friends of the Earth said the measures did not offer a big enough incentive. It said the rate of return on investment should have been set at 10%, instead of the 5-8% the government expects homeowners to make.

Green homes campaigner Dave Timms said the government had been “far too timid”.

“Installing renewable technologies will now be a good investment for many homes - but farmers, businesses, communities and others will get little or no extra incentive to invest in clean electricity,” he said.

Readers' comments (1)

  • What a shame it is when such a good scheme as the forthcoming Feed-In-Tariff - designed to encourage the UK population to invest in renewable energy on a personal level - is undermined by respectable figures such as Professor Doug King. Prof King slams the scheme by saying it is misleading citing micro wind turbines as his only example. What he fails to point out is that photovoltaic panels will provide substantial assistance to carbon reduction strategies and are compatible with the majority of UK homes and businesses. Furthermore the installation of small scale systems, most of which have been proven to work efficiently for many years, will provide tens of thousands of job opportunities. So the new initiatives should be duly welcomed for their full potential and not given negative press by 'experts'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.