Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Government advisors split on nuclear waste


GOVERNMENT ADVISORS were this week unclear about how nuclear waste should be disposed of despite three years of work.

Gordon McKerron, chairman of the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CORWM) has admitted that the committee had so far been unable to reach consensus on the matter.

CORWM has an April deadline for submitting its draft waste disposal strategy to the government.

Revisions resulting from public or ministerial responses to the draft are scheduled to be complete by then, ready for a final report to be published in July.

'It's most likely we will recommend a combination of strategies rather than one size fits all, but scientific, technical, ethical and economic options are still being taken into account, ' McKerron said.

McKerron added that the main options were deep geological disposal, in which waste would be sealed away permanently, and phased disposal.

With phased disposal waste would be placed deep underground and monitored to ensure it remained environmentally isolated and in a safe state.

But he conceded the committee was still looking at 'long-term interim storage' on the surface, handing responsibility for disposal to future generations.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.