Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Govern mental


The pledge of 50% university places (Comment, NCE 29 January) is a government manifesto pledge and we all know that the government will not break its manifesto.

Taxes are not raised directly but extra revenue is raised by using stealth measures so complicated that most people do not understand them let alone realise they are paying extra tax. I firmly believe the government knows that the 50% figure is too high and is depriving industry of 16 year old school leavers to train for a skill.

All young people seem to wrongly consider A-levels and a degree are essential, otherwise they will be classed a failure.

What is required is to train school leavers for the benefit of the UK.

The only escape route for the government to reverse the 50% promise is via the 'back door':

Raise fees to such a level that only those who want a professional qualification will do A levels and a degree, while the others train for a skill that our country requires. I firmly believe that this is the reason behind top up fees.

Brian Shemilt (M) family@shemiltb. freeserve.

co. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.