Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Going with the flow

Letters

The 'storm tunnel' proposed by Thames Water beneath the River Thames (NCE 15/29 December) would be designed to intercept combined sewage flows from historical 'settlement catchments' along a logical route. Computer aided, it would ensure collection - without flooding - of the Ofwat required 30 year return storm runoff from all or any of the separate catchments.

From the tunnel's downstream end, the 'stored' combined sewage would be delivered to treatment. To avoid the full 30 year return storm runoff from the total catchment requiring treatment, Environment Agency discharge consent would allow spills to the Thames say once in five years.

Over a five year period, and starting at the downstream end, this would bring progressive benefit to the Thames and the catchments along the tunnel route. I can sense grudging approval from Sir Joseph Bazalgette!

Denis King (M), denfk@onetel. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.