Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Funds secured for post Ramsgate walkway code

NEWS

DRAFTING OF a new British Standard for ship-to-shore structures will soon begin, after a long-fought battle by the Institution of Civil Engineers and industry secured government funding.

Calls for the new standard came after the collapse of an elevated walkway in the port of Ramsgate in September 1994, killing six people as they boarded a ferry.

At present specialist structures including walkways, linkspans or roll-on roll-off bridges have no specific code. Each is designed using a mix of onshore and maritime standards with industry guidelines such as Lloyds' Rules.

But the Ramsgate accident highlighted the lack of a strict code. Unchecked design flaws were identified as the cause and Swedish firms FKAB and FEAB were heavily fined as were Lloyds' and Port Ramsgate in 1996.

Industry calls for a new Part 8 to the British Standard BS 6349 for Maritime Structures after the accident were backed by a CIRIA report in April 1999. But until a recent apparent about-turn by previous minister Lord Whitty, all negotiations with ministers had failed to secure funding.

The Department of Trade & Industry will now provide £50,000 for the work, along with £5,000 from ICE coffers, and £71,000 of work done pro bono by industry.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.