Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Flush out the gents

Letters

I am often amused by my level of surprise at things I encounter in the construction industry.

We are now in the 21st century and the institutions are looking at ways to attract a greater cross-section of people into the industry, so this particular 'surprise' really causes me some consternation.

Why do the Conditions of Contract for Ground Investigations, prepared by the ICE jointly with the Association of Consulting Engineers and the Federation of Civil Engineering Contractors, still use the term 'gentleman' to open and close their form of tender.

Having discussed the negative image that this portrays with my colleagues in the geotechnical department, they will be taking steps to remove the term from their specifications. Would it be possible for our learned bodies to do the same?

Helen Gribbon, group manager, Buro Happold, Helen.Gribbon@BuroHappold.

com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.