Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fluid argument


I cannot let Professor Baker's letter on the use of computational fluid dynamics for wind loading (NCE 23 November) pass without comment.

It is certainly true that making accurate CFD predictions in any area of application is a non-trivial process and much remains to be learned. Nonetheless CFD does have a useful role to play in the design of effective structures, complementing rather than replacing physical simulation methods.

It is instructive to look at the aerospace industry, where CFD is now essential to the design of modern aircraft, even though it still cannot be trusted to give accurate absolute drag predictions. What CFD has done, however, is to change and limit the use of expensive physical testing by allowing early comparison of possible designs to eliminate the least promising and avoid costly mistakes.

It is in this way that highly efficient wings are now designed that would have been far too expensive or even impossible to design using wind tunnel testing alone. Such a philosophy is already starting to be seen in the design of longspan suspension bridges.

It is also important to recall that wind tunnel testing is itself a simulation method and as such is prone to problems especially in relation to scaling (particularly problematic for smooth shapes) and consistent definition of the atmospheric boundary layer.

Nicholas Waterson, senior engineer, simulation group, Mott MacDonald,

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.