Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Flint stone age

Letters

I was interested in your piece about the London flats collapse (NCE last week). It is not planning officers who deal with applications for internal structural alterations but building control officers, under the requirements of the Building Regulations 2000.

These regulations have nothing to do with the planning process, and such matters would only fall within the jurisdiction of the planning acts if the building was listed.

The local authority has little control over how the work is executed, and by whom, once a full planning application is approved. There is now a pretty clear case for more proactive building control, possibly with a requirement for compulsory insurance or even licensing, as existed in the immediate post war years.

Brian Flint of the Federation of Master Builders represents the predictable establishment view that the cowboys should be rounded up and run out of town. I take the view that poor training and skill levels are endemic in the industry.

By all means introduce more proactive building control, but this should be paralleled by properly funded training schemes.

Alan Turner, Wellside Wedge, Backwell Common, Backwell, North Somerset, BS48 3AE

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.