Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Flaw show


Your story 'Flaws undermine Railtrack safety scheme' (NCE 15 November) is, I believe, a misleading and unfair exaggeration. The rail industry's Sentinel scheme is working well and has effectively stopped the use of workers without valid competencies.

Eleven invalid temporary cards found in a check of over 2,000 is a very small number. It is my understanding that of the 97 other cards you describe as invalid, only one actually was - the others had not been updated due to administrative delays, etc. To put it another way, all but one of the invalid card holders were fully trained and had up-to-date competencies.

The Sentinel scheme is now showing a way forward for the whole of the construction industry. The Health & Safety Executive has for some time been looking at a passport system to record worker training and competencies.

Such a paper system has drawbacks which Railtrack's card system has overcome.

Instead of criticising the achievement, I suggest you should be supporting them and encouraging the whole construction industry to adopt Sentinel as best practice!

Colin Wheeler (F), colin. wheeler@bbrail. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.