Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Few willing to make personal carbon changes, says ICE

Climate change is now accepted as a serious serious fact of life by 80% of the population, according to a survey by the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). But only 9% of people are ready to get rid of their cars, cut out air travel completely or make similar significant changes to their travel habits.

Meanwhile, a third would make moderate changes, such as car-sharing or buying a greener car, and another third would start taking public transport or riding a bicycle.

The survey coincides with publication of the ICE’s State of the Nation, Low Carbon Infrastructure, report which stresses that behaviour change and political action is fundamental to efforts to create a low-carbon society.

It says transport, energy, waste and water networks must be adapted to minimise emissions, and calls for rail electrification, wind farms and combined heat and power plants.

ICE president Paul Jowitt said “Delivering cuts in emissions on the scale needed and within the time restraints that exist will require radical changes in behaviour and society.

“However, public behaviour is restricted by the choices available to them. We need to transform the infrastructure that makes up the fabric of society and underpins economic activity so that the only choices we make are low carbon ones.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • "another third would start taking public transport or riding a bicycle"

    I personally suspect that the number of people who actually have made a change is far lower than those who say they "would" make such a change. Many people think they should be doing something to reduce their carbon emissions, but haven't because of the inconvenience.

    Would a survey which finds out what people HAVE done be much more useful than one which finds out what they WOULD do?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.