Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

False impressions

Letters

The article 'Engineers back use of private firms' in relation to water sewerage provision in Tanzania and other developing countries (NCE 9 June) must surely qualify as the worst NCE article ever.

The headline and first sentence imply that the views of some recognisable group of 'UK engineers' will follow.

But it quotes three individuals - a 'chief executive', an 'international director' and an 'advocacy manager'. How these people represent UK engineers was not established.

First came the RedR representative's 'backing'. But all he said was that the private sector involvement 'can't be ruled out'. Second, the representative of the industry body 'British Water' backed the use of private firms more positively. As he would - it's his job.

Finally, e WaterAid representative made some telling points, such as 'privatisation often fails' - but there was no ringing endorsement of the role of private firms in Third World water supply.

From this meagre evidence, NCE managed to spin the line 'Engineers back use of private firms'.

John Northcott (M), 101A Lansdowne Lane, London SE7 8TN

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.