Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Failing site

Letters

Liz Bennett says 'design professionals need to take professional responsibility for the sites where their designs are to be built. . . .' (NCE 23 September). Designers can only take responsibility for what they are commissioned or have control over. Very few design assignments include this control and I believe the statement to be non-sustainable.

Andrew Allen's recent paper (IStructE Journal 3 August) gives a very balanced critique of the current situation, exposes some fallacious assertions and is well worth reading.

As for what designers should do, first we need our institutions and the Association of Consulting Engineers to lobby the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) for a deterministic method to measure compliance in design.

It is quite wrong that one cannot determine whether or not one is committing a criminal offence.

If the HSE tells us how to make our designs compliant then I am sure that we will.

Geoff M Pinfold, (F), NCL St James Consulting Engineers, 112 Regency Street, London, SW1P 4AX.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.