Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Expense spared

I refer to Professor Lewis Lesley's letter suggesting that high speed rail lines could be built for far less than at present, and quotes the line into St. Pancras as far more expensive than the French TGV lines.
I worked on the early route location studies, in 1989-91, for the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. The initial route chosen, into Waterloo East through west Kent and south-east London, cost only some £600M. It had relatively little tunnelling.

Michael Heseltine, as government cabinet minister, then over-ruled the British Rail recommended route, and laid down that it should go via Thames Gateway, terminating at St Pancras.

This added not only length but major tunnelling – through the North Downs, under the Thames, and much of the way through East and Central London in bored tunnel to St Pancras. Some quarter of the route is in tunnel.

In comparison I would expect that virtually all the French TGV route, which I do not know, is basically on the surface, in a far less densely populated country.

Thus the cost of the UK route, is far more per unit length than the French ones.


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.