The Stay on Forth group has been formed to support a bridge crossing as “the most likely to meet our existing and growing transportation needs in the very limited timeframe available”.
The group wants Transport Scotland to press ahead
with plans for a cable-stayed bridge, following reports by consultants Faber Maunsell and Jacobs recommended that a bridge rather than a tunnel as championed by rival group ForthTAG.
Transport Scotland last week closed its public consultation on a replacement for the bridge and said that a tunnel was still under consideration.
Stay onForth member and civil engineer Alasdair MacKerron told NCE that StayonForth had been “galvanized” into action by “misinformation” from the ForthTAG group.
“We believe that the proposal to build an immersed tube tunnel has been demonstrated to be less beneficial,” said MacKerron.
“However, we are concerned that there is growing support from the public and political parties for the tunnel option, which is based on conjecture, opinion and presentation of partial information by interested parties, presented as fact.”
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment
Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.