Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Engineers battle to reopen M1

Engineers worked through the night to attempt to make southbound lanes on a fire-damaged section of the M1 motorway safe to reopen to traffic by Monday morning.

Two lanes on the northbound carriageway have already been reopened but Roads Minister Mike Penning urged motorists to avoid the route as congestion was expected.

The full width of the motorway between junctions one and four may not reopen until “the middle to the end of next week”, he told Sky News.

Motorists have faced traffic chaos since a blaze ripped through a scrapyard under an elevated section of the motorway on Friday morning, causing significant damage to the bridge’s structure.

Engineers were working to erect a temporary structure under the bridge to give it the stability necessary to carry the weight of traffic.

The Highways Agency said that one southbound lane should reopen overnight and they hoped that a second could be reopened on Monday morning.

Mr Penning said: “We are working as quickly as possible to reopen lanes on the M1. However safety has to be paramount.

“As a former firefighter I know first-hand the intensity of fires of this kind. I’ve seen the damage to the bridge and it should not be underestimated how significant it is.”

He said police were investigating what was stored at the scrapyard and how the incident took place.

Transport Secretary Philip Hammond told BBC1’s The Politics Show that the government would “have to look very carefully at what kind of activities can take place under elevated motorways”.

He said: “Once we’ve seen the scale of impact that a fire can have in a scrap yard under a motorway, I think everybody would agree it is inappropriate to have scrap yards under elevated motorways and we will have to take action to ensure that inappropriate uses are eliminated under motorways.”

Readers' comments (3)

  • John Mather

    In retrospect this looks rather like an accident that was waiting to happen. Similar perhaps to building homes on flood plains. I hope the scrap yard site owners are well insured. The consequential costs, it would appear, are likely to be significant.

    John Mather

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tax payers will end up picking up the bill. Insurers are repudiating claims on any minor non disclosure so they can restore reserves.

    Time for Government action on insurers?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is a considerable amount of regulation to ensure the protection of buildings from fire and yet there are numerous sites around the Midlands where flammable materials are stored in the proximity of unprotected steel support beams of the M5/M6 link. As with a previous comment this was an accident waiting to happen.

    Terry Cowley.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.