Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Electrification plans may be dropped

The government has appeared to indicate it will not go ahead with Labour’s plans for further electrification of the UK’s railway system in the near future.

Earl Attlee, for ministers, said at question time in the Lords that there were “problems” about spending money on electrifying lines given the state of the public finances.

Lord Adonis, who was transport secretary until the coalition took power, had set out £1bn plans last year for electrifying lines between London and Swansea and between Liverpool and Manchester.

Labour’s Lord Faulkner of Worcester asked Lord Attlee today: “Do you agree that the maintenance of the commitment to electrify large parts of the railway system as announced by Lord Adonis and the commitment to build High Speed 2 are both very sustainable and green forms of transport which the new government will follow?”

Lord Attlee replied: “We are committed to High Speed 2 but you will understand the problems about expenditure on electrification in the current economic climate.”

The coalition agreement, however, expresses “support” for “further electrification of the rail network”.

Lord Attlee said that the government was seeking to implement transport savings of £682M in 2010/11.

He said these would include “£112M from direct departmental spend, £100M from Network Rail, £309M from local government grants, a proposed reduction of £108M from the Transport for London grant, and the deferral of £54M from lower priority schemes”.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Surely electrification of the existing network should precede building another railway? Could NCE provide figures for the potential saving in diesel/direct carbon? This being a more practical way of "carbon replacement" than electrifying private vehicles with present technology.

    This looks interesting but short on such figures:-

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.