Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Election dysfunction

Letters

In his column Antony Oliver expresses worry over the few civil engineers on the list of MPs compared, for example, with the number of lawyers, teachers and journalists (NCE 7 April).

As I understand the article, the reason why more civil engineers should stand as prospective MPs is that, if such people are elected, the ICE will have representation close to where decisions are taken on matters to which ICE members can make a valuable professional contribution.

But I thought that the function of MPs was to represent those who elect them, not to exercise influence on behalf of pressure groups or the professional bodies of which they happen also to be members. I mean, whoever heard of an MP who was also a lawyer thinking he wielded any influence with government on behalf of the Law Society- The idea is surely preposterous.

Harvey Moores, 11 Dunstan Glade, St John's Road, Orpington, Kent, BR5 1HU

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.