Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Edinburgh tram hangs in the balance

The future of the Edinburgh Tram project remains in the balance following a City of Edinburgh Council meeting which has called for a confidential update on the project to be provided by December - almost two years after the dispute which has dogged the project began.

The council passed the motion calling for a new report on 14 October following a council report which outlined that the project may open in an initial stage from Edinburgh Airport to St Andrew Square in the city centre - instead of to Newhaven on the Forth waterfront as originally intended - due to “cost and programme difficulties”

The council’s arms length transport body, Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (TIE), and contractor Bilfinger Berger, have been in dispute over the project since February 2009, bringing work to a virtual standstill on the city’s streets. The report noted that there is “unlikely” to be a resolution to the dispute, which covers delays moving of the utility works to allow for the laying of the track and who pays for changes in the project, in the short term.

Bilfinger Berger has now confirmed it has laid off 36 staff working on the project as work has slowed as a result of the dispute.  A source close to the consortium told NCE: “The consortium is deeply concerned by the lack of clear decision making from TIE in terms of taking the tram project forward.

“Progress on the negotiations is slow leading to the loss of extremely good staff and subcontractors. While the consortium remains fully committed to the project, decisions on how to take it forward clearly have to be taken by TIE.”

Edinburgh City Council is still preparing to borrow £55M to supplement its £45M contribution to the project’s planned £545M budget - taking it to £600M. The remaining £500M of the budget comes from the Scottish Government, and the Finance Secretary John Swinney has re-affirmed that this would not be increased. Speaking at the Scottish National Party conference in Perth, he said that there would be “not a penny more” for the project, “not even to rescue it”.

Readers' comments (3)

  • I may be amongst the few for the tram but it saddens me that this cannot be resolved and the project completed as originally planned.
    In the time it has taken The City of Edinburgh and the consortium to fight and delay and cuase upheaval to the project and the people of edinburgh, the City of Brisbane has built 1 tunnel under the river, is progressing nicely with the Airport Link Tunnel, is about to start their 3rd tunnel in the Northern Link Project as well as the Gateway Project. Yet the scottish construction industry and local council can't move some services and build some track.
    It truly is pathetic and a sorry reflection on Scotland. The SNP should get behind it, back it to completion, and stop smugly standing in the corner shouting "We told you so!"
    Perhaps the should call on Lord Mayor "Can Do Cambell" Newman to come over from Brisbane and show TIE and BB how to do it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RE - MATTHEW'S COMMENTS ON BRISBANE CLEM7 TUNNEL

    Perhaps Matthew does not realise it, but the completed tunnel to which he refers in Brisbane was constructed by a JV of Bilfinger Berger, Baulderstone and Leighton. Two of these three parties are wholly owned by Bilfinger Berger (BB).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Neither the City of Edinburgh Council (CEC) nor their wholly owned project supervision team at Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (tie) have taken any notice of the Mott McDonald Report they commissioned in 2003 informing that 70,000 residents will be worse off health wise by 2011, when the Green tram was due to become operational, due to the diversion of general traffic into residential streets. Why? the Green trams, buses and taxis require all the exisiting 'A' road-space into, through and out of the city centre. Already the EU limits for pollutants cuased by general traffic in the rat runs created by the CEC show that Nitrogen dioxide, Particulates PM2.5 and PM10 exceedences are already likely to attract EU fines before we even have Green trams running.
    Alistair Laing FICE.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.