Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Dye used to track radioactive water in Japan

Workers used a milky white dye today as they frantically tried to trace the path of highly radioactive water which is gushing from a tsunami-damaged Japanese nuclear plant and leaking into the ocean.

A crack in a maintenance pit was found over the weekend - the latest confirmation that radioactivity continues to spill into the environment.

The leak is a symptom of the primary difficulty at the Fukushima Dai-ichi complex: radioactive water is pooling around the plant and preventing workers from powering up cooling systems which would stabilise overheating reactors.

Government officials conceded yesterday that it will probably be several months before the cooling systems are completely restored. And even then, there will be years of work ahead to clean up the area around the complex and figure out what to do with it.

Until all the pools of contaminated water are pumped to storage tanks and the cooling system restored, the makeshift methods of pumping water into the reactors and allowing it to gush out wherever it can are the only way to bring down temperatures and pressure in the reactor cores, where fuel rods continue to produce massive amounts of heat even though nuclear reactions have stopped.

“We must keep putting water into the reactors to cool to prevent further fuel damage, even though we know that there is a side effect, which is the leakage,” Hidehiko Nishiyama, a spokesman for the Nuclear Safety and Industrial Agency, said.

“We want to get rid of the stagnant water and decontaminate the place so that we can return to our primary task to restore the sustainable cooling capacity as quickly as possible.”

That makeshift system also complicates plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co’s (Tepco’s) other goal: containing the spread of radiation.

Radioactivity has spewed from the plant since March 11, when a 9.0-magnitude earthquake spawned a massive tsunami which decimated large swathes of Japan’s north-eastern coast.

Up to 25,000 people are believed to have died in the disaster, and tens of thousands lost their homes. Thousands more were forced to flee a 20km radius around the plant because of the radiation.

Over the weekend, an 200mm crack was discovered in a maintenance pit, sending a stream of water into the sea. The area is normally blocked off by a seawall, but a crack was also discovered in that outer barrier today.

While radioactivity is quickly diluted in the ocean, a government spokesman said today that the sheer volume of contamination is becoming a concern. It is not clear how much water has leaked from the pit so far.

“Even if they say the contamination will be diluted in the ocean, the longer this continues, the more radioactive particles will be released and the greater the impact on the ocean,” said Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano. “We are strongly urging Tepco that they have to take immediate action to deal with this.”

The operator said it is ordering fencing that is typically used to contain oil spills. The screens are not designed to trap radioactivity but might curtail the flow of water and thus reduce the spread of contamination, said Tepco manager Teruaki Kobayashi.

In the meantime, the company has tried to seal the leak with concrete and then by injecting a mixture of polymer, sawdust and shredded newspaper farther up a system of trenches, closer to where they believed the source was.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.