Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Dressing room

Reader's write - Letters

If we have to do it at all, why do we dress to the edge and make cycling more difficult? New hot rolled asphalt often has smooth, stone free, water channels left at the kerb.

These are a pleasure to cycle on, and are apparently OK to drive on. Later, when surface dressed, this smooth bit is patchily coated with gravel and the cycling and draining surface lost.

Seeing as we are trying to reduce aggregates, why scatter them on bits we don't need?

Finally, if someone does see the light, can the savings in stone, binder and labour please be quantified? This will help show that cycling is good for the budget as well as our health.

Neil Kermode, neil. kermode@bigfoot. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.