Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Down the drain

Letters

I wish to make some comments on the highway drainage of the A120 Stansted to Braintree Improvement (NCE 24 June).

My concern is over the use of a grass lined drainage channel, called a swale, along the edges of the carriageways.

In principle this has environmental benefit and saves on construction costs.

However, it has a particular disadvantage when used on all-purpose dual carriageways because it takes up most of the verge and, in wet periods, can become extremely soft.

On such carriageways the verge will very likely have to be used by broken down vehicles.

The consequence of this is deep rutting and disruption of the drainage system, plus the possible need for vehicles to be towed out in wet weather.

A two lane all-purpose dual carriageway is the worst situation to use this type of drainage as there is a real pressure on the vehicle in difficulty to leave the carriageway for safety. The most appropriate situation therefore is on motorways with a hard shoulder.

Apart from the A120 I have noticed swales being installed in other dubious circumstances and I wonder if additional advice is needed on the use of this drainage.

Brian Bartlett (M) BartlettBR@aol. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.