Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Design risk


Despite the fascination and challenge of controlling and supervising the design activities of consultants, I believe most contractors do not prefer the design-and-build approach to procurement. This is because of the large potential for discovering problems during their design development stage, a risk which they are largely required to carry.

The problem in this approach often arises from a contractor's inability to appreciate when the designs have reached a stage where they represent adequate resolution of all essential issues surrounding projects.

If the consultant's 'design' role is supplementary or incidental to constructing projects, then greater cost effectiveness should accrue if this role can be eliminated altogether and reliance instead placed on contractors' experience and judgment.

Contractors have the ultimate power to deliver projects to clients. Consultants have the ability to plan and design projects, including their long-term potentialities.

Clearly, whichever side engages consultants, they would tend to work to optimise their interest.

Arvind Kumar (F), 2 Penn Road, Beaconseld, Bucks, HP9 2PX

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.