Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Danish-German crossing client prefers tunnel option

Backers of the 19km Fehmarnbelt Crossing between Denmark and Germany have confirmed that they will recommend the tunnelled option over the bridge proposal, despite recently lauding the benefits of the latter.

Promoter Femern said that an immersed tunnel was less risky to build and operate the alternative cable-stayed bridge proposal, despite the bridge being called “iconic” by the firm.

Both options faced technical risks relating to environmental impact, navigation safety and construction cost.

These were the key factors in choosing the tunnel option, although the promoter’s decision remains provisional pending an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).

A final political decision on which of the two will be selected will be made in early 2011.

It is anticipated that the preferred solution will form the basis for the project application to be submitted to the German authorities.

The project will be officially sanctioned via Danish legislation and subject to approval by the German authorities.

Construction contracts are not expected to be signed until 2014. It will be up to contractors to organise the work, including the location of the large production sites for manufacturing bridge or tunnel components.

Femern said it had assumed that a large proportion of the steel structures for a bridge would be constructed in the Far East – possibly China – while tunnel components would be produced locally owing to their weight. Femern said that production of concrete components should ideally be sited up to 120km from the route corridor.

A more distant siting may also be considered if contractors conclude that this would be more financially competitive.

In financial terms, there is very little difference between the two projects.

The construction estimate (2008 price level) for an immersed tunnel is €5.1bn (£4.27bn) and for a cable-stayed bridge £4.35bn. The construction time for the tunnel is estimated at six and a half years, and for the bridge, six years.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.