Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cut supply to boost demand


So now we know. Apparently the ACE believes that the reason consulting engineers put in such low fee bids is nothing to do with the fact that their competitors are breathing down their necks, but because they are such bad businessmen that they put in low fees just for fun (NCE 17 January).

Presumably civil engineering contractors operate on low profit margins for the same reason?

If there really were a shortage of civil engineers then clients would be on their bended knees imploring us to work for them, not getting competitive offers from a number of firms and almost invariably going for the lowest price.

If the ACE wants to tackle the problems of low pay and morale in the industry then it should focus on limiting the number of chartered engineers to numbers that can command sensible fees.

In this, the ACE is up against the university departments that need to continue turning out graduates to justify their existence.

My solution is therefore that consultants and contractors should headhunt engineering lecturers so that they cease producing the stream of new entrants competing for the finite amount of work available.

Roger Button, 4 Beauford Place, Bath BA1 6RP

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.