Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cullen calls for Railtrack to check track workers

NEWS

RAIL SAFETY will only improve if Railtrack audits the technical competence of all track workers, Lord Cullen's report on the Ladbroke Grove and Hatfield crashes is expected to say later this year.

He is also expected to call for greater clarity over who is responsible for the technical side of safety work, as well as demanding greater controls over working hours for track workers.

The second part of Lord Cullen's report, which was ordered by the Health & Safety Commission, is expected next month. It follows his inquiry into the Paddington and Hatfield rail crashes and will deal specifically with the safety issues raised by the structure of the rail industry.

At present the competence of track workers is only checked by contractors employing them, with Railtrack making cursory checks.

It is expected that in the future Railtrack will have to take more direct control over the employment of these workers, to ensure they have adequate training to carry out specific jobs.

Before rail privatisation, operatives employed by British Rail had to undertake rigorous training courses and site trials.

But training standards now depend on individual contractors and there have been calls for more standardisation.

Railtrack said that although it is looking at improving safety 'the system does not take away the onus from the contractor'.

It said it was already looking at ways of tightening up the supply base, with just a few preferred labour suppliers in each area.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.