Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cuadrilla seeks shale gas extension

Developer Cuadrilla is this week seeking a 36 month extension to shale gas exploration at its site in Lancashire.

The firm is seeking the extension from Lancashire County Council to allow it to continue with its highly controversial hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, at its temporary site near Hesketh Bank. The firm wants the extension to complete its drilling work and analysis to establish whether it is viable to extract shale gas under the UK.

Work has stopped at the site since November last year. Cuadrilla drilled a 3.44km deep well between August and November last year, but after it was completed the firm removed the rig and secured the site.

Although the existing planning permission allows fracking to take place on the site, it needs further approval from the Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc). Decc issued new guidance for fracking in April after an official report revealed work at Cuadilla’s sister site at Preese likely caused two small earthquakes.

Cuardrilla development director Mark Miller is speaking at the Shale Gas summit on 26-27 September.

Readers' comments (2)

  • I have a problem with the use of emotive language like "highly controversial" in a professional magazine such as NCE. I realise that the red top media would like the public to believe that boundary-pushing activities such as fracking are "highly controversial", but I would prefer that the engineering press would leave the use of such emotive (and indeed subjective) language to the same red tops and try to provide factual and objective coverage of news items of interest to engineers and policy makers.

    It concerns me that politicians and others reading such an article could form the view that the engineering profession considers fracking unusually risky and that this could lead to bias against the technology based on nothing more than a few emotive words that need not have beenb printed at all...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unfortunately politics and emotions often over rule common sense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.