Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Crack down on scrap dealers, says Transport Committee

Scrap dealers are the “weak link” in tackling metal theft according to the House of Commons Transport Committee, which has recommended trialling a cashless system.

Last year over 35,000 journeys were delayed or cancelled due to metal theft and the cost to Network Rail was more than £16M.

The committee was reporting back from an inquiry into cable theft on the railways, which found that it was too easy for criminals to sell stolen metal to scrap metal dealers.

The committee recommended that police be given extra powers so that they can enter registered and unregistered scrap metal sites. They also want a new offence introduced of aggravated trespass on the railway.

“Current legislation for regulating scrap metal dealers is out of date” said Transport Committee chairman Louise Ellman. “We need urgent reform to improve the audit trail generated by the scrap metal industry so that criminals selling stolen metal into the trade can be identified much more easily.”

Other recommendations

Reform of the Scrap Metal Dealers Act 1964 so that individuals selling metal have to provide proof of their identity before a transaction can take place.

Greater clarity around compensation arrangements so train operators cannot profit from disruption caused by cable theft.

Network Rail should develop a costed programme of measures to make cable more difficult to steal.

The Department for Transport should update the Committee on work being undertaken to help passengers stranded on trains near stations to complete their journey.

Readers' comments (1)

  • David Stollard

    I completely agree in an overhaul of the legal situation. The same problem is happening on our historic buildings, particularly churches. Here lead is often stripped from the roofs to such an extent that insurance companies will no longer insure for this theft. However, as most buildings are listed, English Heritage insists on like-for-like replacement which the individual church simply cant afford.

    As I understand it, this has been raised in the House of Commons already......

    Happy to provide further information.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.