Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Councils could be rail scapegoats


Local authorities fear the government could make them a scapegoat for cuts in local rail services, the Local Government Association told MPs last week.

They claim efforts to make them more responsible for running rural rail routes will be undermined by their inability to influence track and train operators.

LGA environment board members warned MPs on the Commons transport select committee that they needed to know precisely what costs they would face in running and maintaining services.

Similar information is available when planning road based public transport, they said.

'It [rail] is a lot more fragmented. The sheer fragmentation of the current structure militates against us.

The lack of continuity in funding streams is a big factor, ' said LGA environment board member Tony Page.

'There are local authorities who frequently purchase buses, for example, but that's a service over which they have control and therefore it might be practical to purchase the bus. We don't have control and influence over rail services.'

Both he and LGA colleague Shona Johnstone highlighted the presence of long-term contracts with highway contractors as examples of more stable relationships, which would be hard to emulate in the rail sector.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.