Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Council digs in heels over Stonehenge tunnel


CONGESTION BUSTING plans for the A303 at Stonehenge are in disarray after local councillors voted to ignore schemes proposed by the government in a bid to cap costs.

Instead, at a cabinet meeting shortly before Easter, Salisbury District Council agreed to 'remain supportive' of the original 2.1km £510M bored-tunnel option.

Roads minister Stephen Ladyman canned construction of the bored tunnel in July 2005 after costs escalated from £248M and ordered the Highways Agency to come up with alternatives (NCE 28 July 2005).

But all these involve ploughing the A303 straight across the World Heritage Site (WHS) with either bypasses to the north or south, a cut-andcover tunnel or limited road and junction improvements (NCE 26 January).

Salisbury District Council has remained rmly opposed to any scheme that encroaches on the UNESCO site, a stance now reiterated by its cabinet.

'The cabinet did not wish to weaken the rationale for its position of support for the published scheme, and thus agreed that the council should not give the impression that it was prepared to entertain any alternative options, all of which would produce outcomes in conict with the WHS management plan and local plan policies, ' it said in a statement.

A public consultation on the alternative options nished this week.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.