Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cost and value

Letters

Antony Oliver's comments about the presentation of Olympic project costs are sadly all too accurate (Comment 8 February). The reporting by the media, manipulation by politicians and consequent perception by the public conspire to present an unnecessarily bleak picture.

As an industry, our challenge, in respect of both the Olympics and any other major infrastructure project, is to be sufficiently politically savvy to counter such negative, but now largely predictable, representation.

In response to The Question posed in NCE four years ago: 'Should the government support such a bid (for the 2012 Olympics) and what do you think could seal or scupper it?' (NCE 13 February 2003), I wrote: 'The government should support a bid, managed appropriately it could benefit the UK as a whole.

We lack? nothing that investment and strategic planning can't resolve, but please let the experts deal with these issues! Failure would come swiftly with any political indecision and disagreement.' I stand by my comments.

Simon Lawrence (M), 44 Pen-Y-Bryn Road Gabalfa, Cardiff CF14 3LG

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.