Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Corporate Manslaughter trial adjourned until July

The trial of the first British company to be charged under the new Corporate Manslaughter Act was adjourned today because its director needs “urgent and intensive” medical attention.

Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings is the first firm to be prosecuted under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, designed to make it easier to bring cases against companies.

The charge came after the death of geologist Alex Wright, 27, who was collecting soil samples near Stroud, Gloucestershire when a trench collapsed on him.

Mr Wright, from Cheltenham, died in September 2008, whilst involved in exploratory work on the site at Brimscombe, where houses were to be built.

Company director Peter Eaton, 60, of Stroud, also faces a charge of gross negligence manslaughter.

The trial was due to begin at Bristol Crown Court today but after both sides agreed that Eaton was unwell, the judge put the case back.

Mr Justice Field told the jury: “What has happened in this case is that I have acceded to the application of the defence to adjourn this trial for a longish period because the defendant Mr Eaton requires urgent and intensive medical treatment.

“It would be unfair to require him to participate in this trial at the same time as undergoing this treatment.”

That decision was accepted by all parties, he added.

Eaton could be jailed for life if convicted.

Both he and his company also face one charge each of Failure to discharge a duty, under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. All charges relate to September 5 2008.

The maximum sentence for his firm is an unlimited fine.

The case was adjourned to Winchester Crown Court on a date to be fixed in July.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Is the contention that Peter Eaton set out to kill his employee?
    No, but between him and his qualified employee there has been one serious error of judgement.
    The directors of Stafford Hospital are responsible for overseeing repeated deaths of patients in their care.
    No prosecution but loss of office with a large payoff!
    There is no justice in this area of our legal system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.