Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Corporate manslaughter firm fined £385,000

The first company to be convicted of corporate manslaughter under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 has been given a relatively lenient fine of £385,000 at Winchester Crown Court today.

Justice Field ordered Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings (CGH) to pay the fine in 10 yearly installments of £38,500. The crime carries an unlimited fine, with a suggested minimum of £500,000.

CGH was found guilty on Tuesday of corporate manslaughter after junior geotechnical engineer Alexander Wright died in a trial pit collapse on one of its sites on 5 September 2008.

The relatively lenient fine was due to the small scale of CGH’s operation − as reflected in its small turnover of £154,033 in the year to march 2010 − and its “powerless” current financial state, the judge said.

The court heard that the company has a deficit of £29,671 and would likely have folded already but for the fact that CGH director Peter Eaton recently put in £17,524 of his own money.

Justice Field said he would have also ordered CGH to pay legal costs to the prosecution if the company had been larger or in better financial health.

He said the fine may put CGH into liquidation. “That is unfortunate but it is unavoidable and it is a consequence of this serious breach of duty.”

He said the fine had to “send out a clear message… In particular to those in the construction, excavation and site investigation sectors that it is essential that health and safety guidance and good practice is strictly adhered to”.

Justice Field said the danger of collapse in the pit that killed Wright was “plainly foreseeable”.

“Peter Eaton thought he knew better than the long-established guidance. In this he was gravely and culpably mistaken,” said Justice Field. “It set a lamentable example for young geologists like Wright.”

Wright’s family said they had sympathies with the judge’s decision to be lenient because it might prevent CGH employees losing their jobs.

They said Wright never knew that Eaton planned for him to potentially lead the company after Eaton’s retirement. “He would have adored knowing that,” they said. “Peter Eaton was very good at thinking things but not saying them on a wider scale.”

Readers' comments (4)

  • Discuss what this conviction means for health and safety procedures in NCE's forum

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sad. There but the grace of God go I.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Barry Walton

    And hasn't he State done well out of this unless the fine does bankrupt the firm? No mention of any compensation for Alexander Wright's family and doubtless no budgetting for more costly site investigation by public bodies.

    Barry Walton

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Justice Field's message is clear - the industry must charge rates at which the job can be done safely. We cannot continue to undercut each other and sacrifice lives. This also be applies to providing technical competance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.