Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Controversial Scottish road plans given go-ahead

Environmental campaigners and residents in a Scottish town have lost a bid to prevent the building of a new £400M bypass.

Local objections and a four-month public inquiry into the controversial plans failed to prevent Holyrood from approving the 28-mile Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR).

The road will provide “substantial benefits” to the North East of Scotland, according to finance secretary John Swinney, but opponents condemned the decision to give the go-ahead. The road provoked objections from a range of protest groups unhappy about the proposed route.

Local campaign group Road Sense challenged the Netherley/Milltimber Brae route agreed by ministers, arguing it had been arrived at unfairly. Friends of the Earth and the Scottish Green Party also hit out at the plans.

Much needed

Experts say the road, estimated to cost between £300M and £400M, will ease traffic congestion in the city. A 20% reduction is expected on North Anderson Drive approaching the Haudagain roundabout.

The Government reporters who conducted the inquiry, towards the end of last year, had recommended that the road be given the go-ahead.

Mr Swinney said: “The route will provide a much needed bypass around Aberdeen linking existing major roads and key locations such as the airport, park-and-ride sites and the major industrial estates around the city.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • It was widely reported by news organisations throughout the UK that the roads in Aberdeen where virtually impassible because of snow.

    Will the new 28 mile road be snow free? What precautions will the Highway Authority take to ensure freedom of movement, even in the worst of weather?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.