Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Contractors view


The new style three stage design and build contract being trialled on the transport interchange project and based on partnering, open book accounting and cost certainty, has all the ingredients for success, say regular airport contractors. But several added cautiously: 'It has to work because the airport is not the easiest of clients.'

Tough, adversarial, aloof and easy to fall out with are some of the comments levelled by contractors, though they stress that individual airport staff are fair and professional in their dealings. The new design and build contract apart, it is argued by contractors that most procurement routes result in an unusually high proportion of claims. 'The airport is very quick to go legal, ' say several seasoned companies.

Asked for causes of this 'them and us' approach, contractors thought the airport's command chain was too long and complex. Indecision and buck passing were the result, they claim.

All welcome the new style partnering approach where designs are fully developed and most contract packages let before a guaranteed maximum price is demanded. This indicates, say contractors, that the airport knew it had to change and the way it is going about it 'looks positive'.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.