Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Contra perception


In this week's Debate on whether partnering can be trusted, Karen Gidwani misses the point about partnering, basing her argument on the inadequacy of certain clauses from the new PPC 2000 Standard Form of Contract for Project Partnering.

Partnering does not need a new watertight form of contract to make it work. It works very well already with existing forms of contract if the right team players and common incentive mechanisms are in place. Nonlegal documents are perfectly adequate to impart the principles and processes behind the partnering ethos.

You do not encourage trust between partners by writing clauses into contracts. Trust comes from working as a team with a common purpose, understanding the needs of each partner, aiming for long term relationships and breaking down barriers that contracts all too often serve to reinforce.

Would it be cynical to suggest that solicitors do not like partnering, on account of the significant reduction in contractual claims and disputes that this form of procurement has brought to the civil engineering industry?

Mike Hicks (M) mhicks@pellfrischmann. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.