Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Consultants' workload up, but growth slows


TURNOVER IN UK engineering consultancy hit £7bn last year but is showing signs of slowing, NCE can exclusively reveal.

NCE's annual Consultants File reveals that total fees earned by all consultants rose by just £200M to £5.9bn in 2004, compared with rises of £700M in 2003 and £840M in 2002.

Growth in the roads and building structures markets slowed down while workload in the water sector dropped by £34M to £451M. With the new water spending cycle about to start in April, this is expected to improve next year.

The rail industry was the main area of growth, seeing total fees earned rise by £100M to £681M.

The File also reports a widening gulf between multinational fi ms and the rest.

Smaller consultants said they were unable to bid for work against the new breed of merged super consultancies such as Jacobs, and had to accept checking and sub-consultancy work.

Most consultants predicted growth in UK and international workload but felt that work in Europe would remain stagnant.

Ireland and China were identifi ed as areas with most potential. Hong Kong, Turkey and Germany were areas least likely to show signifi cant growth over the next two years (see box).

INFOPLUS The Consultants File is published with NCE this week.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.